metro-process-link

I was asked recently to review The Professional Scrum Masters Handbook. As I read this book there were times that I shouted at it and I almost stopped reading in disgust around chapter 4.

If you were beside me in the gym when I shouted “Noooooo”, “That is the dysfunction”, or “you can’t fix that that way” then I am sorry. If you make it past chapter four however there are some very helpful tips and tricks.

I would however recommend this book for Project Managers that are new to realities and mechanics of the new processes and techniques involved. If you read What is the role of the Project Manager in Scrum, and you decided on Scrum Master then this is an awesome introductory book. The practices described in this book will most definitely help, just watch out for the land mines.  Let me explain…

At times reading this book I felt that the author has not fully grasped the value and principals of Scrum. She comes across as  more of a mechanic than a process designer. Now don’t get me wrong, this is not a bad thing as mechanics are valuable, but it is something to understand as you follow the stories and anecdotes in the book. It also does not seem that the author has been keeping up with advancements and practice improvements over the last 10 years that have resulted in the upgrades to the Scrum Guide by Ken & Jeff. Every time the author mentions ‘legacy Scrum’ it betrays her woeful lack of knowledge that I believe are required for coaching. As a result it takes an experienced Scrum user and ageist to be able to sift this book for the golden nuggets of information that are in there. without falling fowl of mines it contains.

That said if you are just starting out on your path to agility and need a few pointers you will find them in The Professional Scrum Masters Handbook.

Here are a few of my choice anti-patterns from the book:

  • Is OK to Sprint in Months – This one hit me right away. On reading it again and again I do not believe that the author intended to have it read that matching your Sprints to the months of the year is a good idea.

    “I liked the organisation and simplicity of this list [the backlog]; note how the product management team divided the backlog into months of work [] in a spread sheet. Its easy to group rows under month headings”The Scrum Masters Handbook

  • Its OK to have to have undone work – Another no brainer. There is a recommendation that Teams leave a few ‘buffer’ Sprints at the end of the release for… you know… all that undone work they could not get done in the Sprint. I know that the author was talking about planning, but a novice will make assumptions

    Some teams apply a buffer by leaving empty an entire Sprint or two at the endThe Scrum Masters Handbook

  • Release Planning is a new thing in Scrum – Release Planning has always been a strategy to help one execute of delivering software but it has never been and is not a ‘time box’ in Scrum. It may happen at the behest of the Product Owner outside of the Scrum Team but that is as far as it goes.

    only recently has the Scrum framework been extended to recognise release planning as a bona fide (yet optional) Scrum meeting.The Scrum Masters Handbook

  • The Scrum Master is responsible for reporting – I can’t begin to express how wrong this is. The Product Owner is the one responsible for this.
  • The Release Sprint – In what twisted Scrum world should there be a release Sprint. I understand that those beginning down their journey may need one from necessity, but it is a dysfunction to be recognised and possible accepted, but always questioned. The Definition of Done should be pushed to ‘no further work required for release’.
  • There can be multiple Product Owners of one backlog – There can only be one! Just like highlander there is only one owner that is an individual and not a committee. This allows a decisive vision to be created.

    The teams themselves should be the product owners of the management Scrum team’s product backlog and attend the sprint reviewsThe Scrum Masters Handbook

With all of those negatives, that by the way represent only a small subset of the book, I though I would leave you with some of my favourite quotes:

It will take a generation to die off before we start to see radical innovation in organisational structure to support agility.The Scrum Masters Handbook

And the obligatory:

Sprints are not clown cars into which the product owner can keep stuffing more and more features.The Scrum Masters Handbook

Sad but true…

Conclusion

If you are a Project Manager moving to Scrum then this book will help you with the transition to a new way of thinking. Remembering that this is an embodiment of the mechanics and not the principals.

-Every company deserves working software that successfully and consistently meets their customers needs on a regular cadence. We can help you get working software with continuous feedback so that your lean-agile teams can deliver continuous value with Visual Studio ALM, Team Foundation Server & Scrum. We have experts on hand to help improve your process and deliver more value at higher quality.

Tagged with →